the South; yet they, to a man almost, vote against the free, independent labor of the North and West. I, sir, have inherited my Democracy; have been attached to the Democratic party from my boyhood; have believed in the great truths as enunciated by the "fathers of the faith," and have cherished them religiously, knowing that, by their faithful application to every department of this Government, this nation has grown up from struggling colonies to prosperous, powerful, and Sovereign States. But, sir, when I see Southern gentlemen come up, as I did to-day, and refuse, by their votes, to aid my constituents, refuse to place the actual tiller of the soil, the honest, industrious laborer, beyond the grasp and avarice of the speculator, I tell you, sir, I falter and I hesitate. The amendment of Mr. Grow, forbidding the public sales of lands for at least ten years after their survey, would secure the great bulk of the lands to preëmptors, and would give them a long pay-day, and thus save them from the enormous usury they are now compelled to pay to money-lenders. It would not reduce the revenue derived by the Treasury from the public lands, but would only postpone it, and this postponement would be far less prejudicial to the Government than it would be beneficial to the settler. The Government can borrow money at four and a half per cent per annum, while the settler frequently pays five per cent. per month for the money to enter his lands, to prevent their sale at public auction. On the first of February, the question of the Public Lands was again before the House, the pending bill (House bill No. 72) being a bill to secure Homesteads to actual settlers, and being in the words following: death of the surviving parent, and in accordance with the laws of the State in which such children for the time being have their domicil, sell said land for the benefit of said infants, but for no other purpose; and the purchaser shall acquire the absolute title by the purchase, and be entitled to a patent from the United States. §8. And be it further ex acted, That the register of the land office shall note all such applications on the tract-books and plats of his office, and keep a register of all such entries, and make a return thereof to the General Land Office, together with the proof upon which they have been founded. § 4. And be it further enacted, That all lands acquired under the provisions of this act shall in no event become liable to the satisfaction of any debt or debts contracted prior to the issuing the patent therefor. § 5. And be it further enacted, That if, at any time after the filing the affidavit, as required in the second section of this act, and before the expiration of the five years aforesaid, it shall be proven, after due notice to the settler, to the satisfaction of the register of the land office, that the person having filed such affidavit shall have actually for more than six months at any time, then, and in that changed his or her residence, or abandoned the said entry event, the land so entered shall revert back to the Government, and be disposed of as other public lands are now by law, subject to an appeal to the General Land Office. 86. And be it further enacted, That no individual shall be permitted to make more than one entry under the provisions of this act; and that the Commissioner of the General Land Office is hereby required to prepare and issue such rules and regulations, consistent with this act, as shall be necessary and proper to carry its provisions into effect; and that the registers and receivers of the several land offices shall be entitled to receive the same compensation for any lands entered under the provisions of this act that they are now entitled to receive when the same quantity of land is entered with money. one-half to be paid by the person making the application, at the time so doing, and the other half on the issue of the certificate by the person to whom it may be issued: Provided, That nothing in this act shall be so construed as to impair or interfere in any manner whatever with A BILL TO SECURE HOMESTEADS TO ACTUAL SET- existing preemption rights. TLERS ON THE PUBLIC DOMAIN. §1. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That any person who is the head of a family, or who has arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and is a citizen of the United States, or who shall have filed his intention to become such, as required by the naturalization laws of the United States, shall, from and after the passage of this act, be entitled to enter, free of cost, one quarter-section of vacant and unappropriated public lands which may, at the time the application is made, be subject to private entry, at $1 25 per acre, or a quantity equal thereto, to be located in a body, in con. formity with the legal subdivisions of public lands, and after the same shall have been surveyed. The previous question having been ordered, the House was brought to a direct vote upor this bill, without debate. A motion to lay the bill on the table was los -Yeas, 77; Nays, 113; and the bill was thet passed-Yeas, 120; Nays, 76. As these two votes were substantially the same, we only give the last one, which was upon the passage of the bill, and which was as follows: YEAS. MAINE.-Abbott, Foster, Gilman, Morse, Washburn -5. NEW-HAMPSHIRE.-Cragin, Pike, Tappan-8. VERMONT.-Morrill, Royce, Walton-8. MASSACHUSETTS.-Buffinton, Burlingame, Chaffee, Comins, Davis, Dawes, Gooch, Hall, Knapp, Thayer RHODE ISLAND.-Brayton, Durfee-2. NEW-YORK.-Andrews, Barr, Burroughs, C. B. Coch rane, John Cochrane, Corning, Dodd, Fenton, Goodwin, Granger, Haskin, Hatch, Hoard, Kelsey, Maclay, Matteson, Morgan, Morse, Murray, Olin, Palmer, Parker, Pottle, Russell, Spinner, Taylor, Ward-27. NEW JERSEY.-Adrian, Clawson, Robbins, Wortendyke -4. § 2. And be it further enacted, That the person applying for the benefit of this act shall, upon application to the register of the land office in which he or she is about to make such entry, make affidavit before the said register that he or she is the head of a family, or is twenty-one years or more of age, and that such application is made-10. for his or her exclusive use and benefit, and those specially mentioned in this act, and not either directly or indirectly for the use or benefit of any other person or persons whomsoever; and upon making the affidavit as above required, and filing the affidavit with the register, he or she shall thereupon be permitted to enter the quantity of land already specified: Provided, however, That no certificate shall be given or patent issued therefor until the expiration of five years from the date of such entry; and if, at the expiration of such time, or at any time thereafter, the person making such entry, or, if he be dead, his widow, or, in case of her death, his heirs or devisee, or in case of a widow making such entry, her heirs or devisee, in case of her death, shall prove by two creditable witnesses that he, she, or they, have continued to reside upon and cultivate such land, and still reside upon the same, and have not alienated the same, or any part thereof, then, in such case, he, she, or they, if at that time a citizen of the United States, shall, on pay. ment of ten dollars, be entitled to a patent, as in other cases provided by for law: And provided, further, In case of the death of both father and mother, leaving an infant child or children under twenty-one years of age, the right and the fee shall inure to the benefit of said infant child or children, and the executor, administrator or guardian may, at any time within two years after the PENNSYLVANIA.-Covode, Dick, Florence, Grow, Hickman, Keim, Morris, Phillips, Purviance, Reilly, Roberts, Stewart, Kunkel-13. TENNESSEE.-Jones-1. KENTUCKY.-Jewett-1. OHIO.-Bingham, Bliss, Burns, Cockerill, Cox, Giddings, Groesbeck, Hall, Harlan, Horton, Lawrence, Leiter, Miller, Pendleton, Sherman, Stanton, Tompkins, Vallandigham, Wade-19. INDIANA.-Case, Colfax, Davis, Foley, Gregg, Kilgore, Pettit, Wilson-8. ILLINOIS. - Farnsworth, Hodges, Kellogg, Lovejoy, Morris, Smith, Washburne-7. MICHIGAN.-Howard, Leach, Walbridge, Waldron- INDIANA.-English, Hughes, Niblack-8. MISSOURI.-ANDERSON, Clark, WOODSON-8. Total, 76. Only three Southern members-Jones of Tennessee, Jewett of Kentucky, and Craig of Missouri-voted for the bill, thereby marking unmistakably the sectional character of the opposition to it. The Republican vote, with a solitary exception, was given solid for the bill. Of the Northern members connected with the Democratic party, twenty-nine voted for the bill and six voted against it. Thus, of the entire Democratic party in the House, a large majority was against the bill, but even this is less important than the other fact, that the Southern wing of the vote was almost unanimously against, it being this Southern wing which controls in the party councils, and which, when out-voted in the House, has other departments of the Government, the Senate and the President, with which it is more powerful, and by means of which it has so far rarely failed to defeat measures, however popular and beneficial, which it dislikes. The Homestead bill had now passed the House by a decisive majority, but it had yet to encounter the more dangerous ordeal of the Senate, in which the Democratic majority was larger, and in which the representation of the slaveholding States is proportionably greater. No direct vote upon the measure was, in fact, reached in the Senate, because the Southern managers would not permit it. There are two ways of killing off obnoxious measures. One is, to act upon them and vote them down. Another is, to overslaugh them whenever they are proposed, by proceeding to consider some other business. This latter method is invariably resorted to, where a measure, obnoxious to a majority of the Senate, is supposed to be acceptable to the people. And it was precisely by this method, and for that reasou, that the Homestead bill was run over, shoved aside, evaded, and left unacted upon, by the Senate during its late session. The regular appropriation bills and the bill for the purchase of Cuba were being pressed upon the time of the Senate during the last days of the session, both of them commanding the support of the majority of that body. On the 17th day of February, Mr. Wade, of Ohio, (Con. Globe, page 1074,) moved to postpone all prior orders and take up the Homestead bill, which had passed the House. The following extracts from the debate upon this motion will exhibit the points made: Mr. Wade.-The Homestead bill, to which I am a good deal attached, has, I believe, twice passed the House and come to this body, but somehow it has had the go-by, and we have never had a direct vote upon it here that I know of. I do not propose to discuss it for a single moment, and I hope none of its friends will debate it, because it has been pending before Congress for several years, and I presume every senator is perfectly well acquainted with all its provisions, and has made up his mind as to the course he will pursue in regard to it. I have no hope that anything I could say would win an opponent of the bill to its support; and I hope every friend of the measure will take no time in debate, but will try to get a vote upon it, for I think it is the great measure of the session. All I want, all I ask, is to have a vote upon it. Mr. Reid, of North Carolina.-I think it is too late in the session now to take up this bill to be acted upon here, at least until we act upon other great measures upon which there is more unanimity of sentiment in the country, and a higher sense of duty upon us to pass them during the few days of the session that remain. Mr. Hunter, of Virginia.-I believe that a fortnight from to-day will take us to the 3d of March. Now, it is known that we have nearly all the important appropriation bills, be no effort to press this Homestead bill, so as to displace and one that is unfinished, to take up. I hope there will the appropriation bills. I must appeal to the Senate to consider how little of the session is now left to us, and whether we ought not to take up the appropriation bill and dispose of it. Mr. Shields, of Minnesota.-The friends of this bill desire nothing but a vote upon it, not to waste time in debate. Let us take it up, and have a fair vote upon it. much opposed to it; but I suppose whenever this bill Mr. Hunter-I do not conceal the fact that I am very comes up, it must be the subject of debate. Mr. Wilson, of Massachusetts.-I appreciate the anxiety of the senator from Virginia to take up the appropriation bill; but I would suggest to that senator that he allow us to take up this bill, and have a vote upon it. I do not suppose that anybody, who is in favor of the measure, desires to consume the time of the Senate, at this stage of the nation. It is well understood. I believe it is sus the session, by discussing it. It has been discussed before tained by an overwhelmning majority of the people of the country. us, that this is the last opportunity we shall have to act Mr. Wade. I have no doubt, from the business before upon this great measure, I hope, as I said before, that every friend of it will stand by it until it is either triumphant or defeated, and that, too, in preference to any other business that may be urged upon us. As to the appropriation bills, I have not the least fear but that they will go through. Their gravitation carries them through. motion was carried by the following vote, the Dixon, Doolittle, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Gwin, Hale, NAYS-Messrs. Allen, Bayard, Benjamin, Bigler, Brown, Upon an examination of this vote, it will be seen that the Republicans voted unanimously in the affirmative, and that the Slave State Senators were all in the negative, with the solitary exception of Mr. Johnson, of Tennessee. Of the Free State Democrats, Gwin, Bright, Pugh, Rice, Shields, Smith, and Stuart, all being from the new States, vcted for Mr. Wade's motion. The Homestead bill was now up, and, so far as its friends were concerned, nothing was asked but a vote, which would not have consumed ten minutes. But à vote was precisely what the Southern managers were determined to avoid. Instantly, therefore, upon the announcement of the success of Mr. Wade's motion, which brought the bill before the Senate, Mr. Hunter took the floor, and moved that it be set aside, so as to take up another bill, viz.: the Diplo matic and Consular Appropriation bill. No question of order was raised upon this motion of Mr. Hunter, but it was well characterized as "child's play," to move to set aside a bill, instantly after a vote to take it up. Pending some conversational debate upon Mr. Hunter's motion, the hour of twelve o'clock arrived, and the Vice-President decided that the Cuba bill, having been assigned for that hour, was the subject pending before the Senate. Hereupon, Mr. Wade moved to postpone the twelve o'clock order, and continue the consideration of the Homestead bill, and this motion prevailed by the following vote: YEAS-Messrs. Bell, Bright, Broderick, Chandler, Clark, Collamer, Dixon, Doolittle, Douglas, Durkee, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Hale, Hamlin, Harlan Johnson of Tennessee, King, Pugh, Rice, Seward, Sim mons, Smith, Stuart, Trumbull, Wade, and Wilson -27. NAYS-Messrs. Allen, Bates, Benjamin, Bigler, Brown, Clay, Clingman, Davis, Fitch, Fitzpatrick, Green, Gwin, Hammond, Hunter, Iversons, Johnson, of Arkansas, Lane, Mallory, Mason, Pearce, Reid, Sebastian, Slidell, Toombs, Ward, and Yulee-26. On this vote, an additional Southern Senator, Mr. Bell, of Tennessee, ranged himself on the side of Homesteads. But this was offset by the ratting back to the negative side of Mr. Gwin. The Homestead bill was now again before the Senate, but the question, as stated by the Vice-President, was still upon Mr. Hunter's motion to set it aside, and take up the Consular and Diplomatic Appropriation bill. Mr. Mason, of Virginia, threatened an "extended debate" upon the Homestead bill, if its consideration were insisted upon. He declared, at any rate, for himself that he intended to go into it pretty largely, because he had not yet known a bill so fraught with mischief, and mischief of the most demoralizing kind." these five. Mr. Gwin, is only a temporary resident of a Free State. Of the twenty-eight votes in favor of sustaining the bill, only three are from the South, and only one of the three (Johnson of Tennessee,) is a Democrat. Two days afterward, on the 19th of February, Mr. Wade again moved to set aside all prior orders and take up the Homestead bill; but this motion was negatived by the following vote: YEAS.-Messrs. Broderick, Chandler, Clark, Collamer, Dison, Doolittle, Durkee, Fessenden, Foot, Hale Hamlin, Harlan, Johnson of Tennessee, Jones, King, Pugh, Rice, Seward, Shields, Simmons, Stuart, Trum bull, Wade, and Wilson-24. NAYS.-Messrs. Allen, Bates, Bayard, Benjamin, Bigler, Davis, Fitch, Fitzpatrick, Green, Hammond, Houston, Bright, Brown, Chestnut, Clay, Clingman, Crittenden, Hunter, Iverson, Kennedy, Mallory, Mason, Pearce, Polk, Reid, Sebastian, Slidell, Smith, Toombs, Ward, and Yulee-81. Upon these two days, the 17th and 19th of February, the question was made between the consideration of the Homestead bill and the consideration of the appropriation bills, the necessity of passing which last bills did not fail to be insisted upon by the Democratic managers. At a subsequent stage of the session, as will be presently seen, the question was made between considering the Homestead bill and considering the Cuba bill. Upon the 25th day of February, upon the occasion of a motion by Mr. Slidell to postpone all prior orders and take up the bill for the purchase of Cuba, Mr. Doolittle resisted it, and it down, so that he himself might submit a mocalled upon the friends of Homesteads to vote tion to take up the Homestead bill. Mr. Doo little said: I think it would be better to take up this question of the Homestead bill and vote upon it, and then the Cuba bill will come up. I ask the friends of the Homestead bill now to stand by it and give it the preference. The vote was then taken, and the motion to take up the Cuba bill prevailed, as follows: YEAS-Messrs. Allen, Bayard, Bell, Benjamin, Bigler, Brown, Chestnut, Clay, Clingman, Davis, Fitch, Fitz patrick, Green, Gwin, Hammond, Houston, Hunter, Iver son, Jones, Lane, Mallory, Mason, Polk, Pugh, Reid, Rice, Sebastian, Shields, Slidell, Smith, Stuart, Toombs, Ward, Wright, and Yulee-35. NAYS-Messrs. Broderick, Cameron, Chandler, Clark, Collamer, Dixon, Doolittle, Douglas, Durkee, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Hale, Hamlin, Harlan, Johnson of Tennessee, Kennedy, King, Pearce, Seward, Simmons, ener-Trumbull, Wade, and Wilson-24. Mr. Wade and Mr. Seward, in brief and getic terms, exhorted the friends of the bill to stand firm. The vote was then taken upon Mr. Hunter's motion, and resulted as follows: YEAS.-Messrs. Allen, Bates, Bayard, Benjamin, Bigler, Brown, Clay, Clingman, Davis, Fitch, Fitzpatrick, Green, Gwin, Hammond, Hunter, Iverson, Johnson of Arkansas, Kennedy, Lane, Mallory, Mason, Pearce, Reid, Sebastian, Slidell, Toombs, Ward, and Yulee-28. NAYS.-Messrs. Bell, Bright, Broderick, Chandler, Clark, Collamer, Dixon, Doolittle, Douglas, Durkee, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Hale, Hamlin, Harlan, Houston, Johnson of Tennessee, King, Pugh, Rice, Seward, Simmons, Smith, Stuart, Trumbull Wade, and Wilson-28. The vote being a tie, the Vice-President, Mr. Breckinridge, voted in the affirmative, and thus, after a long struggle, the Homestead bill was, for that day, overslaughed. Of the twenty-eight votes for overslaughing it, all but five are from the South, and ne of The Cuba bill was now up, and the discussion upon it protracted the session late into the night, and almost into the next morning. It was distinctly seen during the progress of this discussion that it would be without practical result, and that no vote could be reached before the final adjournment of Congress. Accordingly, at ten o'clock in the evening, Mr. Doolittle felt it to be his duty to renew the attempt to set aside the Cuba bill, the subjectmatter of a manifestly idle debate, so as to take up the Homestead bill. His motion to that effect, and the commencement of the debate upon it, will be found on page 1351 of the Congressional Globe. Such extracts are made as will exhibit its general character: Mr. Trumbull.-If there was any assurance that the tion was disposed of, I should be willing to see it have Homestead bill could be taken up, after the Cuba questhe go on the present occasion; but we have sought . repeatedly to bring up the Homestead bill, and every | of March, 1860, Mr. Lovejoy, from the Com. movement that has been made to bring it up has been mittee on Public Lands, reported the following net with a counter movement, crowding it out of the way with something else. If the senator from bill (previously introduced by Mr. Grow), which Virginia will give us an assurance that we shall have a was read twice, and committed to the Committee chance to bring up the Homestead bill, and keep it be- of the Whole. fore the Senate until we can get a vote upon it, after the Cuba bill is through, and that he will not interpose an appropriation bill, I would join with gentlemen in asking my friend from Wisconsin to withdraw the motion he has made. Mr. Hunter.-I certainly will press the appropriation bills. I will give no promise to vote to take up the Homestead bill. Mr. Trumbull.-That is as I expected. We now have notice that we are to be met with an appropriation bill the moment that the Cuba question is disposed of, and here we are wasting our time at this stage of the session | in making long speeches, and debating about the acquisition of a country that does not belong to us, instead of providing for the settlement of the country which we own. There can be no hope of getting up the Homestead bill as against an appropriation bill. Mr. Seward.-After nine hours yielding to the discussion of the Cuba question, it is time to come back to the great question of the day and the age. The Senate may as well meet face to face the issue which is before them. It is an issue presented by the competition between these two questions. One, the Homestead bill, is a question of homes, of lands for the landless freemen of the United States. The Cuba bill is a question of slaves for the slaveholders of the United States. Mr. Wade.-I am very glad that this question has at length come up. I am glad, too, that it has antagonized with this nigger question. (Laughter.) I have been trying here for nearly a month to get a straightforward vote upon this great measure of land for the landless. I glory in that measure. It is the greatest that has ever come before the American Senate, and it has now come so that there is no dodging it. The question will be, shall we give niggers to the niggerless, or lands to the landless? I moved some days ago to take up this subject. It was said then that there was an appropriation bill that stood in the way. The senator from Virginia had his appropriation bills. It was important, then, that they should be settled at once; there was danger that they would be lost, and the Government would stop in consequence; and the appeal was made to gentlemen to give this bill the go-by for the time being, at all events, and the appeal was successful. The appropriation bills lie very easy now behind this nigger operation. (Laughter.) When you come to niggers for the niggerless, all other questions sink into insignificance. Mr. Doolittle's motion to set aside the Cuba bill for the purpose of taking up the Homestead bill, was lost, by the following vote: YEAS-Messrs. Broderick, Cameron, Clark, Chandler, Collamer, Doolittle, Fessenden, Foot, Foster, Hale, Hamlin, Harlan, Johnson of Tennessee, King, Seward, Simmons, Trumbull, Wade, and Wilson-19. NAYS-Messrs. Allen, Benjamin, Bayard, Bigler, Brown, Chestnut, Clay, Clingman, Douglas, Fitch, Fitzpatrick, Green, Gwin, Hunter, Iverson, Johnson of Arkansas, Lane, Mallory, Mason, Polk, Pugh, Reid, Rice, Sebastian, Shields, Slidell, Toombs, Ward and Wright-29. This was the last attempt made to get up the Homestead bill in the Senate. It had first been overslaughed by the appropriation bills, and now by the Cuba bill, and no expectation remained of reaching it during the few remaining days of the session. The Republicans, who had endeavored to get it up in all forms and on all occasions without success, felt it to be their duty to abandon a manifestly hopeless struggle. From this review of the votes in the Senate and House, it will be seen that the two great national parties, the one representing the rights and interests of free labor, and the other representing the pretensions of Negro Slavery, have come to a well-defined issue upon this great matter of the disposition of the Public Domain. A BILL TO SECURE HOMESTEADS TO ACTUAL Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Re presentatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That any person who is the head of a family, or who has arrived at the age of twenty-one years, and is a citizen of the United States, or who shall have filed his intention to become such, as required by the naturalization laws of the United States, shall, from and after the passage of this act, be entitled to enter, free of cost, one hundred and sixty acres of unappropriated public lands, upon which said person may have filed a preemption claim, or which may, at the time the applica tion is made, be subject to preëmption at one dollar and twenty-five cents, or less, per acre; or eighty acres of such unappropriated lands, at two dollars and fifty cents per acre; to be located in a body, in conformity to the legal subdivisions of the public lands, and after the same shall have been surveyed. §2. And be it further enacted, That the person ap plying for the benefit of this act shall, upon application to the register of the land office in which he or she is about to make such entry, make affidavit before the said register or receiver that he or she is the head of a family, or is twenty-one years or more of age, and that such applica tion is made for his or her exclusive use and benefit, and those specially mentioned in this act, and not either directly or indirectly for the use or benefit of any other person or persons whomsoever; and upon filing the affidavit with the register or receiver, he or she shall there upon be permitted to enter the quantity of land specified: Provided, however, That no certificate shall be given or patent issued therefor until the expiration of five years from the date of such entry; and if, at the expiration of such time, or at any time within two years thereafter, the person making such entry-or if he be dead, his widow or in case of her death, his heirs or devisee; or in case of a widow making such entry, her heirs or devisee, in case of her death-shall prove by two credible witnesses that he, she, or they have resided upon and cultivated the same for the term of five years immediately succeeding the time of filing the affidavit aforesaid; then, in such case, he, she, or they, if at that time a citizen of the United States, shall, on payment of ten dollars, be entitled to a patent, as in other cases provided for by law: And provided, further, That in case of the death of both father and mother, leaving an infant child, or children, under twenty-one years of age, the right and fee shall inure to the benefit of said infant child, or children; and the executor, administrator, or guardian may, at any time within two years after the death of the surviving parent, and in accordance with the laws of the State in which such children for the time being have their domicil, sell said land for the benefit of said infants, but for no other purpose; and the purchaser shall acquire the absolute title by the purchase, and be entitled to a patent from the United States, on payment of the office fees and sum of money herein specified. SEC. 3. And be it further enacted, That the register of the land office shall note all such applications on the all such entries, and make return thereof to the General tract-books and plats of his office, and keep a register of Land Office, together with the proof upon which they have been founded. quired under the provisions of this act shall in no event SEC. 4. And be it further enacted, That all lands acbecome liable to the satisfaction of any debt or debts contracted prior to the issuing of the patent therefor. time after the filing of the affidavit, as required in the SEC. 5. And be it further enacted, That if, at any second section of this act, and before the expiration of the five years aforesaid, it shall be proven, after due no tice to the settler, to the satisfaction of the register of the land office, that the person having filed such affidavit shall have actually changed his or her residence, or abandoned the said entry for more than six months at any time, then, and in that event, the land so entered shall revert to the government. SEC. 6. And be it further enacted, That no individual shall be permitted to make more than one entry under the provisions of this act; and that the Commissioner of the General Land Office is hereby required to prepare and issue such rules and regulations, consistent with this In the House of Representatives, on the 6th act, as shall be necessary and proper to carry its provi sions into effect; and that the registers and receivers of the several land offices shall be entitled to receive the same compensation for any lands entered under the provisions of this act that they are now entitled to receive when the same quantity of land is entered with money, one-half to be paid by the person making the application at the time of so doing, and the other half on the issue of the certificate, by the person to whom it may be issued: Provided, That nothing contained in this act shall be so construed as to impair or interfere in any manner whatever with existing preemption rights: And provided, further, That all persons who may have filed their applications for a preêmption right prior to the passage of this act shall be entitled to all privileges of this act. Subsequently, a motion was made by Mr. Love-Clernand, James C. Robinson, E. B. Washburne-7 NEW-JERSEY.-Adrain, Riggs, Stratton-3. PENNSYLVANIA.-Babbitt, Campbell, Covode, Florence, Grow, Hale, Hall, Hickman, Junkin, Killenger, McKnight, McPherson, Millward, E. Joy Morris, Schwarts Scranton, Verree-17. OHIO.-Ashley, Bingham, Blake, Carey, Corwin, Cox, Edgerton, Gurley, Helmick, Howard, Hutchins, Charles D. Martin, Pendleton, Sherman, Stanton, Tompkins, Trimble, Vallandigham-18. joy, to reconsider the vote by which the bill had been referred to the Committee of the Whole. On Monday, March 12, Mr. Lovejoy called up this motion, and under the operation of the previous question, it was agreed to, 106 to 67, as follows: MICHIGAN-Cooper, Francis W. Kellogg, De Witt C. Leach, Waldron-4. INDIANA. Case, Colfax, John G. Davis, Dunn, English, Holman, Kilgore. Niblack, Porter, Wilson-10. ILLINOIS.-Fouke, Wm. Kellogg, Logan, Lovejoy, Mc WISCONSIN.-Larrabee, Potter, C. C. Washburn-3. MISSOURI.-James Craig-1. Total, 115. All from the Free States except James Craig, of Missouri. NAYS. PENNSYLVAVIA.-Montgomery-1. MARYLAND.-H. Winter Davis, J. M. HARRIS, Hughes, VIRGINIA. Bocock, De Jarnette, Edmundson, Garnett, Jenkins, Leake, Elbert 8. Martin, Wilson, Pryor, William Smith-10. NORTH CAROLINA.-Branch, GILMER, Ruffin, WILLIAM N. H. SMITH, VANCE-5. YEAS.-Messrs. Adrain, Aldrich, Ashley, Babbitt, SOUTH CAROLINA.-Bonham, Keith, McQueen, Miles-2. GEORGIA.-Gartrell, HARDEMAN, HILL, Jackson, Jones, Love, Underwood-7. ALABAMA.-Clopton, Cobb, Curry, Houston, Suydenham Moore, Pugh-6. MISSISSIPPI-Barksdale, Reuben Davis, Lamar, Me LOUISIANA.-Landrum-1. MISSOURI.-Thomas L. Anderson, Noell, Woodson--8 KENTUCKY.-GREEN, ADAMS, WILLIAM C. ANDERSON, BRISTOW, Burnett, MALLORY, Peyton, Simms, Stevenson-8. Total, 65. Dem., of Pennsylvania. This bill was sent to the Senate, where it was referred to the Committee on Public Lands, and on the 17th of April, Mr. Johnson, of Ten NAYS-Messrs. GREEN ADAMS, Thomas L. Anderson, WILLIAM C. ANDERSON. Avery, Barksdale, Bocock, Bonham, BRABSON, Branch, BRISTOW, Burch, Burnett, Clopton, Cobb, Curry, Reuben Davis, De Jarnette, Edmundson, English, ETHERIDGE, Garnett, Gartrell, GILMER, Hardeman, J. MORRISON HARRIS, HATTON, HILL, Hindman, Houston, Hughes, Jackson, Jenkins, Jones, Keitt, Lamar, Landrum, Leake, Love, MALLORY, Elbert 8. Martin, MAYNARD, McQueen, McRae, Miles, Millson, Montgomery, NELSON, Niblack, Noell, Peyton, Pryor, Pugh, Reagan, Ruffin, Sickles, Simms, Singleton, William Smith, WILLIAM N. H. SMITH, Stevenson, STOKES, Underwood, VANCE, WEBSTER, Whiteley, Woodson, and Wright-67. Republicans in Roman; Democrats in Italics; Ameri-nessee, the Chairman of that Committee, recans in SMALL CAPS; Anti-Lecompton Democrats in ported a substitute for the House bill, granting Homesteads to actual settlers, at 25 cents per acre, but not including preemptors then occu When this bill came pying the Public Lands. before the Senate for action, Mr. Wade, of Ohio, moved to amend, by substituting the House bill, which was lost, 26 to 31, as follows: Clark, Collamer, Dixon, Doolittle, Douglas, Durkee, YEAS-Messrs. Anthony, Bingham, Cameron, Chandler, Foot, Foster, Grimes, Hale, Hamlin, King, Rice, Seward, Simmons, Sumner, Ten Eyck, Toombs, Trumbull, Wade, Wilkinson, and Wilson-26. Roman spaced. So the motion was reconsidered, and the bill was before the House. Mr. Lovejoy moved that the bill be engrossed and read a third time. Mr. Branch (N. C.) moved to lay the bill on the table. Lost, 62 to 112, the yeas being all from the South, except Mr. Montgomery, Democrat, of Pennsylvania, and the nays all from the North, except Mr. James Craig, Democrat, of Missouri. So the House refused to lay the bill on the table; and it was read a third time and passed. The vote was as follows-The Republicans in Roman, the Administration Democrats in Italics, the Americans in SMALL CAPS, and the AntiLecompton Democrats in Roman spaced: YEAS. Chesnut, Clay, Clingman, Davis, Fitch, Fitzpatrick, MAINE.-Foster, French, Morse, Perry, Somes, Israel Rice, and Toombs. NEW-HAMPSHIRE.-Marston, Tappan-2. The Senate finally, on the 10th May, passed Mr. Johnson's bill, 44 to 8, the Nays being Messrs. Bragg, Clingman, Hamlin, Hunter, Mason, Pearce, Powell and Toombs. The House refused to concur; the Senate refused to recede, and the result was a protracted conference on the part of Committees of the two Houses, which committees finally came to an agreement. |