During the debate, on March 28th, between Mr. Simmons of Rhode Island, and Mr. Davis of Mississippi, the latter made these remarks: "The Senator runs into an error which 1 find very often prevails, that the militia of the States are not a part of the Army of the United States. It is our glory that the defence of the country rests upon the people. He proposes, then, to arm the militia in time of peace with a weapon which they will not use in time of war."— Congressional Globe, 1st Session, 36th Congress, Part 2, P.

1351.

In the House, the bill was referred to the Committee on Military Affairs, and was not reported.

Washington, December 13th, 1860. To our Constituents: The argument is ex hausted. All hope of relief in the Union, through the agency of committees, Congres sional legislation, or constitutional amend ments, is extinguished, and we trust the South will not be deceived by appearances or the pretence of new guarantees. The Republicans are resolute in the purpose to grant nothing that will or ought to satisfy the South. We are satisfied the honor, safety, and independence of the Southern people are to be found only in a Southern Confederacy -a result to be obtained only by separate State secession-and that the sole and primary aim of each slaveholding State ought to be its speedy and absolute separation from an unnatural and hostile Union.

Signed by J. L. Pugh, David Clopton, Sydenham Moore, J. L. M. Curry, and J. A. Stallworth of Alabama; Alfred Iverson, J. W. H. Underwood, L. J. Gartrell, and Jas. Jackson, (Senator Toombs is not here, but Crawford of Georgia; Geo. S. Hawkins of would sign), John J. Jones, and Martin J. Florida. It is understood Mr. Yulee will sign it. T. C. Hindman of Arkansas. Both Senators will also sign it. A. G. Brown, Wm. Barksdale, O. R. Singleton, and Reuben Davis of Mississippi; Burton Craige and Thos. Ruffin of North Carolina; J. P. Benjamin and John M. Landrum of Louisiana. Mr. Slidell will also sign it. Senators Wigfall and Hemphill of Texas, will sign it.

to the caucus : Mr. Davis made the following statement

Being a member of the Committee of

Thirty-three, I state that the above witnessed despatch was communicated to the committee this evening, and a resolution passed proposing no specific relief, eight Northern

in effecting Secession.

Senator TooMвs has publicly declared in Georgia that he would, under no circumstances, serve in the Senate after the inauguration of Mr. Lincoln. He said the same thing in the following telegraphic despatch to Mr. KEITT :

"Macon, November 14th, 1860. "To Hon. L.M. KEITT: I will sustain South Carolina in secession. I have announced to the Legislature that I will not serve under Lincoln. If you have the power to act, act at We have bright prospects here. "R. TOOMBS."

once.

SOUTHERN MANIFESTO.

Washington, December 13th. At the request of Hon. REUBEN DAVIS of Mississippi, member of the Committee of States, the Southern members of Congress assembled at his rooms to-night and adjourned at eleven o'clock, at which the following declaration was made and signed by those present. It had already been presented to the Committee of Thirty-three:

counteract the effect of the above despatch, the South. From information derived from and, as I believe, to mislead the people of Republican members of the committee and other Northern Representatives, I fully concur in the above despatch.

REUBEN DAVIS.

The Savannah News of Monday, December 24th, publishes the following address to the people of Georgia, telegraphed from Washington, on Saturday, December 22d:

Fellow-Citizens of Georgia: I came here to secure your constitutional rights, or to demonstrate to you that you can get no guarantees for these rights from your Northern Confederates.

The whole subject was referred to a committee of thirteen in the Senate yesterday. I was appointed on the committee and accepted the trust. I submitted propositions, which, so far from receiving decided support

from a single member of the Republican party on the committee, were all treated with either derision or contempt. The vote was then taken in committee on the amendments to the Constitution proposed by Hon. J. J. CRITTENDEN of Kentucky, and each and all of them were voted against, unanimously, by the Black Republican members of the CoLimittee.

In addition to these facts, a majority of the Black Republican members of the committee declared distinctly that they had no guarantees to offer, which was silently acquiesced in by the other members.

that the rights of the South, and of every State and section, may be protected within the Union. Don't give up the ship. Don't despair of the Republic. J. J. CRITTENDEN. S. A. DOUGLAS.

From the Raleigh Standard Extra of Jan uary 2d.

The State Journal of to-day, one of the organs of the disunionists, contains a tele graphic despatch calculated, and no doubt intended, to inflame the public mind and to precipitate North Carolina into revolution. This despatch, most probably sent here from the Journal Office, Wilmington, is as fol lows:

IMPORTANT!-IMMEDIATE RETURN OF LEGIS

That committee is controlled by Black Republicans, your enemies, who only seek to amuse you with delusive hope until your election, in order that you may defeat the friends of secession. If you are deceived by them, it shall not be my fault. I have put the test fairly and frankly. It is decisive against you; and now I tell you upon the faith of a true man that all further looking to the North for security for your constitutional rights in the Union ought to be instantly abandoned. It is fraught with nothing but ruin to yourselves and your posterity.

Secession by the fourth of March next should be thundered from the ballot-box by the unanimous voice of Georgia on the second day of January next. Such a voice will be your best guarantee for LIBERTY, SECURITY, TRANQUILLITY and GLORY.

ROBERT TOOMBS.

IMPORTANT TELEGRAPHIC CORRESPONDENCE. Atlanta, Georgia, December 26th, 1860. Hon. S. A. Douglas or Hon. J. J. Crittenden: Mr. TOOMBS's despatch of the 22d inst. unsettled conservatives here. Is there any hope for Southern rights in the Union? We are for the Union of our fathers, if Southern rights can be preserved in it. If not, we are for secession. Can we yet hope the Union will be preserved on this principle? You are looked to in this emergency. Give us your views by despatch, and oblige

WILLIAM EZZARD.
ROBERT W. SIMS.
JAMES P. HAMBLETON.
THOMAS S. POWELL.
S. G. HOWELL.

J. A. HAYDEN.

G. W. ADAIR.

R. C. HONLESTER.

Washington, December 29th, 1860.

In reply to your inquiry, we have hopes

LATORS TO THEIR POSTS.

"Cabinet broken up in a row; Floyd, Thompson and Thomas have resigned; the President has gone over to the North. Federal troops on their way South. Our fort at the mouth of Cape Fear will shortly be occupied by troops for coercion. The citizens of North Carolina call upon the Legislature for advice and assistance."

The above produced great excitement in our community. As soon as we saw it we telegraphed to a well-informed and reliable friend in Washington city, whose reply is as follows:

"No troops ordered South. No new ground for excitement known."

Special Despatch to the Republican. Augusta, Ga., Jan. 1st. A special despatch to the True Democrat, of this city, dated at Washington, 3 o'clock, P.M., to-day, says:

"The cabinet is broken up, Mr. Floyd, Secretary of War, and Mr. Thompson, Secretary of the Interior, having resigned. A coercive policy has been adopted by the Administration. Mr. Holt, of Kentucky, War. Fort Pulaski is in danger. The Aboour bitter foe, has been made Secretary of litionists are defiant."

This despatch is signed "Robert Toombs

"

This spurious and inaccurate despatch had a great influence, it is said, in deciding the wavering vote of Georgia on the question of union or disunion.

The Macon (Georgia) Telegraph of the 2d instant, contains the following sensation despatch from the President of the South Carolina Convention. Of course it obtained immediate currency throughout the Southern States:

Charleston, January 1st, 1861. Mayor of Macon: The Convention of South Carolina have directed me to send you the following telegram just received from our Commissioners at Washington:

Holt has been appointed Secretary of

"D. F. JAMISON, "President South Carolina Convention."

From the Neu Orleans Delta.

THE SOUTH CAROLINA CONVENTION TO THE CITY OF NEW ORLEANS.

The following highly-important despatch from the President of the South Carolina Convention, has been furnished to us for publication by Mayor Monroe, to whom it was addressed:

Charleston, January 1st.

To the Hon. John T. Monroe, Mayor of New Orleans: The Convention of South

Carolina has directed me to send you the following telegram, just received from our Commissioners at Washington:

Holt has been appointed Secretary of War. He is for coercion, and war, we believe, is inevitable. We believe reinforcements are on the way. We shall prevent their entrance into the harbor at every haz

ard.

"D. F. JAMISON, "President South Carolina Convention."

From the National Intelligencer. In January, when the Crittenden plan of adjustment was voted down in the Senate, rather because of the absence of Southern Senators than by the strength of its opponents, we find from the St. Louis journals, that a despatch was reported to have been straightway sent from Washington to that city by Senators Polk and Green, representing as follows:

"The Crittenden resolutions were lost by

a vote of 25 to 23. A motion of Mr. Cameron to reconsider was lost; and thus ends all hope of reconciliation. Civil war is now considered inevitable, and late accounts declare that Fort Sumter will be attacked without delay. The Missouri delegation

recommend immediate secession."

We need not say that no such despatch was ever sent by these gentlemen. Yet, says the St. Louis Republican, all over the city (St. Louis) it was spoken of as the despatch from Messrs. Green and Polk." The temporary rejection of the Crittenden plan was in like manner pressed into the

service of the Secessionists in order to accelerate the pace of grave, deliberate, and patriotic North Carolina. The Raleigh Register of the 19th instant contains the following despatch, under the signature of Mr. Crittenden himself, published to counteract the disturbing effect of the exaggerated rumors which had been put in circulation from this city:

"Washington, January 17th, 9 P. M. "In reply, the vote against my resolutions will be reconsidered. Their failure was the result of the refusal of six Southern

"JOHN J. CRITTENDEN." Senate, January 25th, 1861.

MY DEAR SIR: Mr. Crittenden is not present, but I can say with confidence that there is hope of adjustment, and the prospect has never been better than now since we first assembled.

Very truly, your friend,

S. A. DOUGLAS. We concur in the opinion that there is hope of an adjustment. J. J. CRITTENDEN, A. R. BOTELER, JOHN T. HARRIS.

Hon. JAMES BARBOUR.

In addition to the foregoing testimony on the subject, we insert an extract of a letter

from the Hon. John S. Millson to Mr. Barbour to the same effect:

"For myself, I say that I have never had so confident an expectation as I have at this time, of such a termination of the present controversy as would be satisfactory to me, and, I believe, to a large majority of the people of Virginia."

TO THE PEOPLE OF VIRGINIA.

We deem it our duty, as your Representatives at Washington, to lay before you such information as we possess in regard to the probable action of Congress in the present alarming condition of the country.

At the beginning of this session, now more than half over, committees were appointed, in both Houses of Congress, to consider the state of the Union. Neither committee has been able to agree upon any mode of settlement of the pending issues between the North and the South.

The Republican members in both committees rejected propositions acknowledging the right of property in slaves, or recommending the division of the Territories between the slaveholding and non-slaveholding States by a geographical line.

In the Senate, the propositions commonly known as Mr. Crittenden's were voted against by every Republican Senator; and the House, on a vote by ayes and noes, refused to consider certain propositions, moved by Mr. Etheridge, which were even less favorable to the South than Mr. Crit tenden's.

A resolution giving a pledge to sustain the President in the use of force against the seceding States, was adopted in the House of Representatives by a large majority; and in the Senate every Republican voted to substitute for Mr. Crittenden's proposi tions resolutions offered by Mr. Clark of New Hampshire, declaring no new concessions, guarantees, or amendments to the Constitution were necessary; that the demands of the South were unreasonable, and that the remedy for the present danger was simply to enforce the laws; in other words, coercion and war.

In this state of facts, our duty is to warn you that it is vain to hope for any measures of conciliation or adjustment (from Congress) which you could accept. We are also satisfied that the Republican party designs, by civil war alone, to coerce the Southern States, under the pretext of enforcing the laws, unless it shall become speedily apparent that the seceding States are so numerous, determined and united, as to make such an attempt hopeless.

We are confirmed in these conclusions by our general intercourse here; by the speeches of the Republican leaders here and elsewhere; by the recent refusals of the Legislatures of Vermont, Ohio and Pennsylvania, to repeal their obnoxious Personal Liberty Laws; by the action of the Illinois Legislature on resolutions approving the Crittenden propositions, and by the adoption of the resolutions in the New York and Massachusetts Legislatures (doubtless to be followed by others) offering men and money for the war of coercion.

We have thus placed before you the facts and conclusions which have become manifest to us from this post of observation where you have placed us. There is nothing to be hoped from Congress-the remedy is with you alone, when you assemble in sovereign Convention.

We conclude by expressing our solemn conviction that prompt and decided action, by the people of Virginia in Convention, will afford the surest means under the Providence of God, of averting an impending civil war, and preserving the hope of reconstructing a Union already dissolved.

J. M. MASON,

R. M. T. HUNTER, D. C. DE JARNETTE, M. R. H. GARNETT, SHELTON F. LEAKE, E. S. MARTIN, H. A. EDMUNDSON, ROGER A. PRYOR, THOS. S. Bocock, A. G. JENKINS. Washington City, January 26th, 1861. [Owing to the detention of Ex-Governor Smith, at his home in Virginia, by sickness, this address could not be presented to him for his signature. There is no doubt he would have joined in it, if present.]

to Fort Sumter and elsewnere. Will not Virginia, by her Legislature, interpose to prevent coercion? It will be too late when her Convention meets. "J. S. PRESTON.'"

despatch was received by another distinThe Richmond Whig states that a similar guished member of the Legislature, "to which, after consultation with many leading members of the Legislature, a reply was of no attempt at coercion, but that the made to the effect that we, here, had heard President was exerting himself to preserve peace."

IN FEBRUARY.

From the Nashville Union of February 6th. VIRGINIA DESPATCHES.-Our special despatch with regard to the Virginia election is direct from Richmond, and is from the Editors of the Richmond Enquirer. Of course it is more reliable than the despatch sent by the Associated Press of the same date.

Special Despatch to Union and American. men have carried the Convention overwhelmRichmond, (Va.) Feb. 5th.-Resistance elected ingly. Submission Unionists, not twenty ENQUIRER.

From another column of the same paper.

THE OLD DOMINION-ALL HAIL! A voice, as from the grave of the immortal Washington, tells us that Virginia will be true to her ancient, ever glorious, historical renown. Throughout the length of her immense territories only twenty Submissionist Union men have been elected. Virginia will before the 4th of March declare herself absolved from all further obligation to a Government, etc. It is eminently proper that the State which was the leader in the Revolution, and the first to proclaim the great doctrine of State-rights in 1799, should lead the column of the Border States.

From the Nashville Union of February 7th.
IMPORTANT DESPATCHES!
Listen to the following glorious news
from old Virginia:

Richmond, Feb. 6th.-To Wm. Williams: The Submissionists will not number thirty

in the Convention. The Resistance men have more than one hundred elected. The action of the Convention will be prompt as soon as the Washington Conference adjourns. ENQUIRER.

Will Tennessee elect members to her Convention that wish to wait, wait, wait

until Black Republicanism trample us in the dust or kick us out?

We are indebted (says the Charlotte Bulletin) to our much-esteemed Senator, the Hon. T. L. CLINGMAN, for the following highly important-information, by telegraph, dated: