Page images
PDF
EPUB

exaggerated the aggrandizement of the slaveholding class. Secondly, whether the movement that I now forbode is really more improbable than the evils once seemed, which are now a startling reality.

How are these immediate evils, and whatever of greater evils that are behind them, to be prevented? Do you expect that those who have heretofore counseled compromise, acquiescence, and submission, will change their course, and come to the rescue of liberty? Even if this were a reasonable hope, are Cass, and Douglas, and Buchanan, greater or better than the statesmen who have opened the way of compromise, and led these modern statesmen into it? And if they indeed are so much greater and so much better, do you expect them to live forever?

Perhaps you expect the slaveholding class will abate its pretension, and practice voluntarily the moderation which you wish, but dare not demand at its hands. How long, and with what success, have you waited already for that reformation? Did any property class ever so reform itself? Did the patricians in old Rome, the noblesse or the clergy in France? the landholders in Ireland? the landed aristocracy in England? Does the slaveholding class even seek to beguile you with such a hope? Has it not become rapacious, arrogant, defiant? Is it not waging civil war against freedom, wherever it encounters real resistance? No! no! you have let the lion and the spotted leopard into the sheep-fold. They certainly will not die of hunger there, nor retire from disgust with satiety. They will remain there so long as renewed appetite shall find multiplied prey. Be not self-deceived. Whenever a property class of any kind is invited by society to oppress, it will continue to oppress. Whenever a slaveholding class finds the non-slaveholding classes yielding, it will continue its work of subjugation.

People of Michigan, I know full well that it seems ungracious in me to dwell on this painful theme. It is not such an acknowledgment of your manifold hospitalities as you expected. It is hard for the weary mariner to look steadily on the newly revealed rocks toward which he has too long been carelessly drifting. It is not easy for the prodigal to look with contentment on the rags and husks which meet him as he retires from the house of his harlotry. Nevertheless, there is no way of escaping any imminent danger, without first calmly and steadily looking it fully in the face and ascertaining its real nature and magnitude.

Here again you will deny the justice of my parallels; you will claim to be merely innocent and unfortunate, and will upbraid the slaveholding class as the builders of this impending ruin. But you cannot escape in that way. The fault is not at all with that class, but with yourselves. The slaveholders only act according to their constitutions, education and training. It is the non-slaveholding classes in the free states who are recreant to their own constitutions, and false to their own instincts and impulses, and even to their own true interests. Who taught the slaveholding class that freedom, which could not be wholly conquered at once, could be yielded in successive halves by successive compromises? Who taught the. slaveholding class the specious theories of non-intervention and popular sovereignty, and the absolute obligation of tyrannical laws enacted by armed usurpation? Your own Cass, and Douglas, and Pierce, and Buchanan. Who established Cass, Douglas, Pierce and Buchanan at Washington, and gave them the power to march their slaveholding armies into Kansas? The non-slaveholding society in the free states, and no portion of that society more willingly and more recklessly than you, the people of Michigan.

You admit all this, and you ask how are these great evils, now so apparent, to be corrected—these great dangers, now so manifest, to be avoided. I answer, it is to be done, not as some of you have supposed, by heated debates sustained by rifles or revolvers at Washington, nor yet by sending armies with supplies and Sharpe's rifles into Kansas; I condemn no necessary exercise of the right of self-defence anywhere. Public safety is necessary to the practice of the real duties of champions of freedom. But this is a contest in which the race is not to the physically swift, nor the battle to those who have most muscular strength. Least of all is it to be won by retaliation and revenge. The victory will be to those who shall practise the highest moral courage, with simple fidelity to the principles of humanity and justice. Notwithstanding all the heroism of your champions in Washington and Kansas, the contest will be fearfully endangered if the slaveholding class shall win the president and the congress in this great national canvass. Even although every one of these champions should perish in his proper field, yet the rights of man will be saved, and the tide of oppression will be rolled back from our northern plains, if a president and a congress shall be chosen who are true to freedom. The people, and the people only, are

VOL. IV.

35

sovereign and irresistible, whether they will the ascendancy of slavery, or the triumph of liberty.

Harsh as my words may have seemed, I do my kinsmen and brethren of the free states no such injustice as to deny that great allowances are to be made for the demoralization I have described. We inherited complicity with the slaveholding class, and with it prejudices of caste. We inherited confidence and affection toward our southern brethren-and with these, our political organizations and our profound reverence for political authorities, all adverse to the needful discussion of slavery. Above all, we inherited a fear of the dissolution of the Union, which can only be unwholesome when it ceases equally to affect the conduct of all the great parties to that sacred compact. All these inheritances have created influences upon our political conduct, which are rather to be deplored than condenined. I trust that at last these influences are about to cease. I trust so, because, if we have inherited the demoralization of slavery, we have also attained the virtue required for emancipation. If we have inherited prejudices of caste, we have also risen to the knowledge that political safety is dependent on the rendering of equal and exact justice to all men. And if we have suffered our love for the Union to be abused so as to make us tolerate the evils that more than all others endanger it, we have discerned that great error at last. If we should see a citizen, who had erected a noble edifice, sit down inactively in its chambers, avoiding all duty and enterprise, lest he might provoke enemies to pull it down over his head; or one who had built a majestic vessel, moor it to the wharf, through fear that he might peradventure run it upon the rocks, we should condemn his fatuity and folly. We have learned at last that the American people labor not only under the responsibility of preserving this Union, but also under the responsibility of making it subserve the advancement of justice and humanity, and that neglect of this last responsibility involves the chief peril to which the Union itself is exposed.

I shall waste little time on the newly-invented apologies for continued demoralization. The question now to be decided is, whether a slaveholding class exclusively shall govern America, or whether it shall only bear divided sway with non-slaveholding citizens. It concerns all persons equally, whether they are protestants or catholics, native-born or exotic citizens. And therefore it seems to me that this is no time for trials of strength between the native-born

and the adopted freemen, or between any two branches of one common Christian brotherhood.

As little shall I dwell on merely personal partialities or prejudices. affecting the candidates for public trusts. Each fitly personates the cause he represents. Beyond a doubt, Mr. Buchanan is faithful to the slaveholding class, as Mr. Fillmore vascillates between it and its opponents. I know Mr. Fremont well; and when I say that I know that he combines extraordinary genius and unquestionable sincerity of purpose, with unusual modesty, I am sure that you will admit that he is a true representative of the cause of freedom.

Discarding sectionalism, and loving my country and all its parts, and bearing an affection even to the slaveholding class, none the less sincere because it repels me, I cordially adopt the motto which it too often hangs out to delude us. I know no north, no south, no east and no west; for I know that he who would offer an acceptable sacrifice in the present crisis must conform himself to the divine instructions, that neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, shall we worship the Father; but the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshipers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth. Last of all, I stop not to argue with those who decry agitation and extol conservatism, not knowing that conservatism is of two kindsthat one which, yielding to cowardly fear of present inconvenience or danger, covers even political leprosy with protecting folds; and that other and better conservatism, that heals, in order that the body of the commonwealth may be healthful and immortal.

Fellow citizens, I am aware that I have spoken with seriousness amounting to solemnity. Do not infer from thence that I am despondent and distrustful of present triumph and ultimate regeneration. It has required a strong pressure upon the main-spring of the public virtue to awaken its elasticity. Such pressure has reached the center of the spring at last. They who have reckoned that its elasticity was lost, are now discovering their profound mistake. The people of the United States have dallied long with the flowers of the acactus, and floated carelessly on the calm seas that always reflect summer skies, but they have not lost their preference for their own changeless fleur de lis, and they consult no other guidance, in their course over the waters, than that of their own bright, particular and constant star, the harbinger of liberty.

THE POLITICAL PARTIES OF THE DAY.

AUBURN, OCTOBER 21, 1856.

WE are neighbors and friends. We know each other well. I know that you are sincere, and you know, as I trust, that I am a man of not ungrateful disposition. We have a common memory of many long and inclement political storms through which we have passed, not altogether without occasional alienations and separations. You, therefore, can readily conceive, without amplification on my part, how profoundly gratifying it is to me now to see not only a general brightening of the skies, auspicious of the triumph of the political principles which I have cherished through so many trials, but also troops and crowds and clouds of friends, more numerous, more earnest and more confiding than those by whom I was surrounded in the most successful and happiest periods of my earlier life.

If politics were indeed, as many seem to suppose, merely an uncertain sea, bounded on all sides by rich ports and havens tempting private adventure, I should not be one of those who, standing on the beach, would be inciting my fellow citizens to commit themselves on board this party craft or of the other. If politics were, as others seem to think, merely a game cunningly compounded of courage, accident and skill, in which prizes and crowns were to be won by the victors for their own glory and the excitement of the multitude, I certainly should not be found among the heralds of the contestants on either side. If, again, politics were only a forum in which social theories, without immediate bearing on the welfare and safety of the country, were discussed, I might then be a listener, but I should not be a disputant.

But, although politics present these aspects to superficial obser vers, they are nevertheless far more serious and practical in their real character. They are the regulation and direction of the actual life of the American people. How much of individual, domestic and

« PreviousContinue »