for the first time-His judicial administration a reaction against the later tendency JUDICIAL LIFE.-A. D. 1856-1860. Antagonism in politics between the Southern States and the New England States Anti-slavery - Slave-trade with Africa carried on by New Eng- landers - Declaration of Independence and a sale of negroes published in the same paper in Massachusetts-Slavery especially recognized by the Constitu- tion - John Quincy Adams accuses New England Federalists of a design to break up the Union - Character of Mr. Adams - The abolitionists -- The nature of radicalism Abolition petitions in Congress - Mr. Adams's jubilee oration— Chief-Justice Taney's letter on the occasion - President Van Buren - Both political parties ignore great men for the Presidency Mr. Webster - President Buchanan - The Dred Scott case- The accusation of Chief-Justice Taney by William H. Seward - Letters from Mr. Justice Campbell and Mr. Justice Nel- son in regard to the Dred Scott case - Letter from Reverdy Johnson in regard to the case- - Chief-Justice Taney's opinion of Mr. Seward - The State of Wis- consin by its Supreme Court nullifies the process of the Supreme Court of the United States; and by its Legislature declares nullification to be a right of a State-Chief-Justice Taney's opinion in regard to the conduct of Wisconsin. JUDICIAL LIFE.-A. D. 1860-1864. A new political era-Southern civilization superseded by New England - - ryman case-Civil war - The Governor of Ohio disregards the Constitution of . 401-446 CHAPTER VII. PRIVATE LIFE. The delicacy of the attempt to portray the private life of the Chief Justice — APPENDIX. Opinion in the Dred Scott case -- A supplement to the opinion Opinion in the case of Ableman vs. Booth - Opinion in the case of Kentucky vs. Ohio - MEMOIR OF ROGER BROOKE TANEY, LL.D. CHAPTER I. EARLY LIFE AND EDUCATION. (Written by Mr. Taney himself.) A. D. 1777-1801. BEGIN this account of my life at Old Point Comfort, Virginia, on the 16th of September, 1854. It is late to begin it, for, if I live until to-morrow, I shall be seventy-seven years and six months old. I may not live to finish it, and, if finished, it may not be thought worthy of publication. Of that, however, my executors must judge. The work is undertaken without much deliberation. Ten days ago, I had never thought of it. But I received at that time Mr. Van Santvoord's Lives of the Chief Justices of the U. States, and among them is a sketch of my own. The work is full of interest, and obviously prepared with much labor and industry. My life is, therefore, to form a part of the history of the country. The high offices I have filled, and the stirring and eventful political scenes in which I was engaged before I received the appointment I now hold, and in which my position compelled me to take a prominent part, may naturally create a desire to know more about me than can be found in Mr. Van Santvoord's life. Yet I am sensible that he has written it in the kindest spirit, and has used every means in his power to obtain information from those whom he supposed might be able to give it. The truth is, that scarcely any one living could do much more than Mr. Van Santvoord has done. I have survived all my early associates and companions, and most of those also with whom I was acting in maturer life. At the moment I am writing, the names of dear and valued friends who are now in their graves come crowding on my memory, and I begin this work in sadness and sorrow. But if there is any curiosity to know more about me than Mr. Van Santvoord narrates, it cannot be gratified, unless I write my own biography. Indeed, upon thinking the matter over, I have come to the conclusion that, if the public should be indifferent and careless as to my life and character, the work may derive some interest from its connection with men and things as they existed in the generation which has now passed away. I belong to that generation, and lived and acted in it and with it. And the history of my life is ne |