Page images
PDF
EPUB

VOL. XIV. No. 10: LONDON, SATURDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 1978. [PRICE JOÐ.

[ocr errors][merged small]

SUMMARY OF POLITICS. DUKE OF YORK.la the natural, hough, perhaps, vain, hope, that what I Dow write may be read at a time when many umstances, now notorious and familar, have been forgotten, I am indacea to Ar upon the subject before me with a fornity of statement, which, were it not for sch hope, would be absurd, or at least, ould not appear quite necessary. -For one weeks past, I might say for some paths, there has been a talk about sendiag be Duke of York, who is, and, for several

rs, has been, the Commander in Chief the land forces of this country, to take the Lef command of the troops sent, and about

be sent, by England, to the aid of the eople of Spain and Portugal, in their present chous struggle against the French. This amour has excited great interest amongst racks of people, from the leading men in nd about the metropolis, down to the very was in their Sunday mornings' chat at the Lurch doors; and, upon this subject, though

no other that can be mentioned, there ppearsto have been a perfect unanimity of feelng and of expression. The press has not been die. It has, in all the ways that it is capase of operating, kept pace with the colquial discussions; and, as party writers, vão are opposed to each other, must have mething, in each other, to find fault with, very writer appears to have made it his stuly to seek out, in his opponent, as an ob

et of attack, a failure, in some respect or sther, to do justice to the public sentiment upon this particular subject.Such, with respect to the Duke of York, was the state of the public mind, when, about twelve days ago, an anonymous pamphlet of fifty-three pages, published by Mr. Symonds of PaterRosterRow, London, made its appearance, under the title of " A PLAIN STATEMENT OF THE CONDUCT OF THE MINISTRY AND THE OPPOSITION, TOWARDS HIS ROYAL HIGHNESS THE DUKE OF YORK;" which pamphlet it is my present intention to analyse and remark upon.- -First, however, let me state what the pamphlet does not contain. When I saw a thing written in the way of answer to those, who, in the base cant of the day, are called the libellers" of the Duke of York, I naturally expected

[ocr errors]

-Joy.

-[354

to find, in this answer, something or other respecting the military commands, with which he had before leen invested; because the point, and the sole point at issue, was whether, or not, he ought now to have the command in Spain; and, no one could possibly fail to perceive, that that point must be decided, in all rational and impartial minds, by the experience of the past. What was my surprize, then, to find, that the pamphleteer, the avowed defender and eulogist of the Duke, said not a word of the Duke's commands upon the continent of Europe, and did not even glance at them from the beginning to the end of his work, though of the publications, of which it was his object to complain, there was not one, which had not, in some way or other, touched upon those commands! Before all other things, therefore, it appeared necessary to clear up these matters, or, at least, to say all that an advocate was, upon such an occasion, able to say. But, instead of this what have we? Why the following curious logic, which I may venture to say will long remain without an equal.-" From his youth upwards, his royal highness has "passed through every stage of his military career. No one has yet appeared so totally

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

wanting of all truth, as to question his "royal highness's personal courage. Let "it be granted then, that with this acknow"ledged personal courage, added to the com

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

mon sense, which, we should hope, no one will deny him, his royal highness has, at least, obtained the common knowledge "of his profession. Let us at least allow "him what is denied to no one, that he "cannot have passed through such a course "of study, and under the best masters of "the age, without having acquired what "is almost necessarily acquired by every "" one in a similar course. Grant that his "royal highness is not superior to other ge"nerals, why should he be inferior? It is "known to every one who approaches him, "that he is not wanting in natural talents, a solid and just understanding, "and in the art of observing, and availing "himself of his observations. Let us put it "therefore, to the candour of the public, "and of the gentlemen of the army, if, with "such an understanding and such expe

" in

M

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

"rience, such advantages of rank, and "with such good masters, it is not a "reasonable presumption, that his royal highness has at least the common and sufficient knowledge of his military profession? Surely, it is not too much to ask "this concession."--This is not, indeed, generally speaking, much to ask. The disputant who should refuse to grant it, even in this particular case, might be deemed cruel, perhaps. But, suppose he should refuse, and suppose his refusal should be grounded upon a denial of those premises, which this expert reasoner presumes all the world to adinit? Upon this supposition. what becomes of the argument? It is not thus, that men argue to conviction. Conviction, by the means of argument, requires premises really admitted, or, which is the same thing in effect, facts which are generally acknowledged, and which ach nowledge. ment is a necessary consequence of wellknown deeds or events. If, indeed, this writer had appealed to the history of the actions, in which the Duke has been engaged, and shewed us that there were proofs of what he chose to take as his premises, the conclusion might naturally have followed; but, whatever may be the fact, however true it may possibly be, that the Duke has, at least, the common and sufficient knowledge of his military profession," this writer has stated nothing, nothing at all, in proof of the proposition; which, therefore, remains a subject open to discussion, but which I do not think it necessary to discuss, and shall only just observe, with respect to the best masters of the age, either the writer must allude to such as are now under the Duke's own command, or to such as have been beaten, and driven from one end of Europe to the other, by that enemy, against whom we have now to contend. But, is it sufficient to ask us,

66

why the Duke should be inferior to other "generals?" Is it right to throw upon the public the burthen of proof, that our Commander in Chief, that the person on whose wisdom and skill and valour so much must depend, that the person who is entrusted with the defence of our comtry; is it right to throw upon us the burthen of proving, that this person is inferior to other generals? Is it upon ground like this, that the writer puts forward a claim to our conti dence ? One might have expected, that the avowed advocate of him, who is so highly empowered and entrusted, and who ree ives stabs so very large from the public pure, would have made it a poiat, especially as his professed purpose was to remove

[ocr errors]

public prejudices," to end avour, at leas to convince us, that the Duke, the perso who is to have the chief command in d fending our properties and our lives, is sup rior, in military merit, to other general or to such other generals, at least, as have in our service. If the country ben in danger; if there be not a strong probal lity, that this land will be invaded by powerful foreign foe, why all these pr rations? Why all these forts and posts a barracks; why all these volunteers and lo militia and foreign troops; why such i mense expenses; why such sacrifices of ev description? Well, then, such being case, is it sufficient to ask us to prove, t he, who is entrusted with the direction all this force, is inferior to other gencri Is this thought suflicient to satisfy us, cially when accompanied with a charge libel against every one, who, for 3 past, has dared to move his pen upot subject? Such a writer does, verily, co plain, with a good grace, that the sp

"of the times is not in favour of even t "measured obedience, that moderate t

[ocr errors][merged small]
[ocr errors]

to the very existence of a community What does he wish for? What degrees what marks of submission does he wa All that has been said; all that has offe him; all that has stirred his gall, and un his stupid head and vindictive heart to executing of this miserable pamphlet. consisted of supplications, uttered in deli hints and faultering accents, the effusion the fears of a people, whom the love life has not yet entirely forsaken. we come to what the pamphlet does conta and this is expressed in a very few wor it is a reproachful complaint against b the ministry and the opposition for ba suffered the Duke of York to be "belle as this writer calls it, by the several eda of papers, and other writers, in this ki dom, and for having done nothing is fence of his character. The person pre ring this complaint, says, that the pre administration, for reasons best known themselves, choose to detach an individ from their body, to put him, as it were, of the covering protection of their soc and to give encouragement to a public pr cution of him; that any one, not acquain with public affairs, would be astonished to told, that the most effective officer in the st he who should at least be the most effect officer, is represented as one who is t to be trusted with the execution of " fails most immediately within his official a ties, and when the ministers of the cou

"Since the days

as this writer evidently is. it "of William III. there have existed in "this kingdom two avowed parties; an Opposition and a Ministry. As a defence "from the overwhelming predominance of

neither repel this accusation nor act upon do the ministers, asks he, believe it, or not? If they do, why not act upon it? If not, is there no Attorney General, or no Treasury papers? Is every possible fund of defeace exhausted? He asks, whence it has happened, that, in all the friendships and eamities of parties, in all these contests of contrarieties, the Duke of York has never had even the usual advantage, being neglected by one party and passed over by another? He says, that a powerful party have been indisposed against the Duke, have withheld from him the natural and necessary protection due to his rank and station, have left him naked to the assaults of his low-minded libellers, left him without allies in his time of need; and, asks he, "in what manner "has CORIOLANUS So offended both the "Consuls and the Senate, that he is cast

out naked to meet his fate amongst the "factious Tribunes?" In the aptness of a comparison consists its merit. CAIUS MARCIUS, though of a patrician family, was urged, by his zealous valour, to serve as a common soldier, in the Roman army, at the siege of Cariola. The Romans having been repulsed, he rallied some of his comrades, fell upon the enemy, and, pursuing them in their retreat, rushed pell-mell along with them into the city, of which he thus made himself master. The resemblance between the two characters, thus far, will easily be traced; and we have only to continue it through their moral virtues. The Roman General allotted to the gallant youth the richest part of the booty; but, he would accept of nothing but the name of CORIOLANUS, one horse, and one prisoner, who had formerly been his host, and whom he instantly set at liberty. The writer of the pamphlet before us, says that the Duke of York is not fond of flattery, which, we may presume, was his sole reason for not digressing in this place to cite some such instances of gratitude, disinterestedness, and magnanimity, in the subject of his fifty-three pages of eulogium.

-Having stated the fact of this disinclination, in both parties, towards the Duke, the writer then proceeds to state the cause of it; for, it will be easily perceived, that it was quite necessary to his purpose to find cut a cause, other than that which the public have been disposed to alledge. This cause, then, is, he says, that the Duke had all along adhered to a settled resolution, never to belong to any party. And here I shall, for a while, confine myself to a mere quotation from the pamphlet, the matter being of a very delicate nature, if any thing can be called delicate coming from such a silly brute

66

66

either, every succeeding monarch has "deemed it necessary to have a kind of Do"mestic Party-a kind of Closet and Fa

mily Council, whom he may occasionally "interpose between even his ministry and

himself. The origin of this party has "been imputed to his majesty's father, or "rather, to his mother whilst Dowager of

Wales; but the point of fact is, that it "existed in the reign of George I., and "seems to have had no other origin than in "its manifest necessity. It was not the "creature of any design, or previous ar

rangement; but, as a matter of pruder.c›, "and necessary defensive policy, grew insensibly out of the very nature of things. "Now the immediate and almost neces

[ocr errors]

sary members of this Party, are certainly "the King's Family and Household. Let "it not, therefore, be objected to the Duke "of York, that he has followed the course "of things."-Leaving this pretty description of a government to be commented on by those who have been so long in the habit of eulogizing our "glorious Consti

66

[ocr errors]

tution," I now proceed to quote what is said about the cause of the enmity which the Opposition are said to bear the Duke.---`` It was represented to "his majesty, that according to the principles upon which his ministry had "humbly offered their services, the public "expected of them, and they conceived "themselves obliged, to introduce a perfect "reform in all the branches of public ser"vice-that the Army wanted this reform, "and that his majesty would be pleased to "consent, that a private Commission of

Inquiry should be appointed to sit daily at "the Horse Guards, and that the report of "this commission should be presented to "his majesty's most gracious consideration.

[ocr errors][ocr errors]

-To this, likewise, his majesty con"sented, and his royal highness did not oppose it. The List of the Commis"sioners was made by the ministry, and "for the sake of appearances, the name of "his royal highness was not omitted. His

[ocr errors]

royal highness, however, did not deem it "decorous to sit on a Court of Inquiry into "his own conduct. The party, therefore, " and the Commission had their own Presi"dent. It is not the purpose of the pre

[ocr errors]

sent Notes to enter into any detail as to "the decency with which they executed "this inquisition. Suffice it to say, that

"after a party, and therefore a rigorous "inquiry, it was not deemed prudent either "to make or to present a report. ~ Another "resolution was taken, and it was deter"mined to attempt indirectly, and as it "were by intrigue, what could not be

[ocr errors]

hoped from other more direct means. It "must really be matter of astonishment "to all candid men, that individuals of an "honourable name, and hitherto reputed "to be of corresponding sentiments, "should descend to such an unworthy cunning. The characteristic of a great, and a little mind, says Bacon, is, that the "former takes the strait road, whilst the "latter creeps warily but cowardly to its "object by a bye-path.-Two measures, "it is stated, were accordingly adopted by "the party. The one was to represent to "his royal highness, that the multiplicity "of business in the office of commander in

66

chief required that his royal highness "should have some assistance, and that "therefore the ministry had to propose to "his royal highness a division of his depart

[ocr errors]

66

ment; that the branches from which his royal highness would be thus relieved,

might either be put in commission, as"signed to certain boards, or supplied by "individuals;-that in the latter case the "ministry would consider it as belonging "to them to recommend, but that the no"mination should be in his royal highness. "That it was not amongst their wishes to diminish any thing of the patronage of his royal highness, or to detract any thing "from the splendour of the commander in "chief. But that from regard to his royal

[ocr errors]

highness, and from a deep consideration "of the value of his royal highness's time 46 as commander in chief in the higher of"fices of his department, it was the anxi

46

[ocr errors]

ous wish of the ministry to relieve his royal highness from the subordinate detailsA negotiation was accordingly commenced with his royal highness upon these grounds; in the course of which "his royal highness learned what was in"tended by these "subordinate details, "" and minor branches." His royal high"ness, in a word, learned, that these sub. "ordinate details, and minor branches, such as to reduce his office to a mere "cypher, and leave him, as commander in "chief, in a situation about as active, as

[ocr errors]

were

[merged small][ocr errors][merged small]

"gotiation was accordingly broken off with

[ocr errors]

abruptness and mutual disgust.Is it a "reasonable subject of surprise, therefore, "that thus beset, thus assailed at once by "the open hostility of some, and the in"sidious friendship of others, his royal "highness deemed it necessary to throw "himself upon the immediate protection of "his royal father ? -The proposed measure of the Grenville party was thus defeated by the immediate interposition, not to say the command of his majesty. "this ambitious party, though thus dis p "pointed, were not defeated; they invent"ed another rallying post, and the words "military council. and military board of

[ocr errors]

66

[ocr errors]

66

But

[merged small][ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Nothing could be more unpleasant than "the situation of his royal highness during "all this turmoil of intrigue and faction. "His open assailants were of a class with "whom his royal highness could not, con"sistent with his personal dignity, enter "into a contention. In what manner, for example, could he oppose the attack of newspapers, the assault of paragraphs, "and the storm of diurnal invective? Every "newspaper was in the hands of the reigning party, or if one of them boasted "of its independence, it usually proved its "claim by a daring attack on his royal highness. This abuse was usually introduced "in terms expressive of the "candour and "" reluctance" of the writer. They were "unwilling (good creatures!) to wound "the feelings of any individual, and par"ticularly of one in every respect so meri"torious as his royal highness; but in com

[ocr errors][ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

mon candour they were compelled to ac"knowledge, that the perilous situation of "affairs called for unusual vigour in the mi

[ocr errors]

litary department, and that his royal bighness would be much relieved, by the ap

66

-After some personal remarks, in which Earl Grey is represented as arrogant, Earl Moira no wiser than he should be, and Mr. Windham as inconstant in his friendships, the pamphleteer proceeds to state, that the Opposition consider the Duke as having had a share in their dismissal; but he denies the fact, and says: "The late ministry were "dismissed solely because they personally "offended, and contradicted in a point of

"pointment of a military council. The sibly account for one part at least of the gene"similarity of all these paragraphs, and "ral hostility against his royal highness."-"certain words which were common to all, "seemed to bespeak their common origin, "and the public hearing the same thing "said on all sides, and by all parties, began "to conclude that there was something in it; " and the press, in pamphlets and reviews, "echoed back the clamour of the daily jour"nals."The author then goes on to speak of the complaints made by the Duke to the ministers, upon the subject of these attacks, but of complaints we shall notice bye and by. At present our attention is called to a paragraph of the pamphlet, which is extremely mysterious, but which, perhaps, the reader will make shift to comprehend. "In this manner, in this urgency for a direct inquiry оп one side, and this refusal to grant it on "the other, passed away the whole period "of the late administration, until some time ❝ about the conclusion, when it was deemed "necessary, from party expediency, and "from motives which require no explana"tion, to make CERTAIN PROPOSALS "to his royal highness. To these proposals "his royal highness may be presumed to have answered, that it was the settled maxim "of his life to belong to no party, but to "consider himself as the servant and subject "of the king ;-that he moreover did not

[ocr errors]

agree in opinion with his majesty's mi"nisters upon the points in agitation; but "did not deem it necessary to explain him"self more fully. That with respect to any “OPPOSITION AGAINST HIM his royal highness might have added, that he was at a "loss to understand what could be intended "by it, as his majesty's ministers, in all "his royal highness's demands for inquiry, "had repeatedly disavowed their knowledge "of any such personal hostility. Under all "circumstances his royal highness could,

[ocr errors]

we think, see no sufficient reason for departing from the settled maxim of all his "former life,-to consider himself as a "member of the royal family, and the ser"vant of his sovereign alone. That, least "of all, therefore, could his royal highness. "have any will or opinion in contradiction "to that of his father-Within a few days "after this latter negociation, the Grenville "and Fox party had ceased to be ministers, "and his majesty had summoned others to "his council. It may be collected from "this statement, that neither in the com"6 mencement, nor in the conclusion of the "Grenville administration, could this party "be considered as friendly to his royal high

ness. This statement, moreover, may pos

conscience, his majesty. His majesty had "no council but his own mind. He had ta "ken his resolution when he summoned the "attendance of the Duke of York. He "conceived himself as having been deceiv"ed by earl Grey; he accordingly declin"ed seeing that nobleman. The Duke of "York, it is understood, merely obeyed "the commands of his father, when he "signified by letter his majesty's pleasure "that lord Howick should not come to Wind"sor."He then proceeds to state the cause of the hostility of the present ministry towards the Duke of York, which statement I shall give in his own words :-" With respect to the Ministry, his royal highness "is about as favourably situated as with the "Opposition. The enmity of the one may "be as easily accounted for on the ordinary

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

passions of mankind, as the other. His "royal highness, however, we presume, "cannot complain that the existing admi"nistration are not friendly to him. Friend

66

ship is not a thing of right on one side or "of obligation on the other. He never, "we believe, sought the friendship of mi"nisters, and therefore has no complaint "that he does not possess it. There is, "however, or at least there should be, a "middle term between friendship and en"mity. Where, therefore, is the justi"fying cause for the conduct of adminis"tration? When his majesty had resolved "to constitute a new administration, if pub"lic report may be credited, his royal high

68

ness had it in command from the king to "inform the duke of Portland of his ma"jesty's intentions. His royal highness, it " is said, executed his majesty's commands "in person. He is said to have repeated 86 only the words of the king, and distinct"ly to have informed the duke of Portland, "that he was to consider his royal highness "in no other point of view than as the mes66 senger bearing certain words of his ma "jesty; that he had no list, and no authority to designate any individual whatever. "In a conversation which followed, the same reports add, that his royal high

[ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »