| Frederick Maxwell Danson, John Horatio Lloyd - Commercial law - 1830 - 366 pages
...their inspection to assist them in coming to their decision. A verdict was found for the defendant, leave being reserved to the plaintiff to move to enter a verdict for the amount of the bill. A rule nisi having been obtained, in Trinity term, to enter a verdict for the... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1871 - 982 pages
...suit— and the cause was tried at the Glamorganshire Spring Assizes, 1865, and resulted in a verdict for the defendants, leave being reserved to the plaintiff to move to enter a verdict for him, if the Court should be of opinion either that the will conferred no power on the tenant for life... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1833 - 1308 pages
...could not bring an action for the original demand. A verdict was thereupon taken for the defendant ; leave being reserved to the plaintiff to move to enter a verdict, either for the full amount of his demand, or the amount of the composition. A rule nisi for that purpose... | |
| William Tidd - Civil procedure - 1837 - 942 pages
...two dfmises, and a verdict taken for the plaintiff on one, and for the defendant on the other, and leave being reserved to the plaintiff to move to enter a verdict for him on the second demise, he ii not precluded from doing so, by his having obtained early execution... | |
| Great Britain. Bail Court, Alfred Septimus Dowling - Civil procedure - 1840 - 940 pages
...1, c. 4, s. 4. The learned judge received the evidence, and a verdict was found for the defendant, leave being reserved to the plaintiff to move to enter a verdict for him. Jervis moved accordingly. Since the case of Earl Spencer v. Swannell (a), it must be admitted,... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Common Pleas, John Scott - Law reports, digests, etc - 1841 - 814 pages
...c. 170 (179). Of this opinion was the learned judge, and accordingly the objection was disallowed, leave being reserved to the plaintiff to move to enter a verdict for 41. 4s., if the court should be of opinion that the witness was not competent. A further objection... | |
| |